Beyonce embarrassed by BuzzFeed photos

Beyonce photos: publicist asks BuzzFeed to remove unflattering images

Beyonce photos: unflattering or no, once they’re on the internet, they are on the internet. Beyonce’s publicist contacted BuzzFeed after reporter Lauren Yapalater published a post highlighting the singer’s “fiercest” moments from her Super Bowl performance. The PR flak complained the pictures were “unflattering” and asked for them to be replaced with others. Buzzfeed, of course, declined. Instead, the site ran a second post citing the publicist’s email and drawing attention to the seven photos the PR flak wanted to remove. It’s called the Streisand effect. Attempting to suppress information has the opposite effect of causing information to spread further. Maybe now we should be referring to it as the Beyonce effect? ENGLISH:

史翠珊效應?不!是碧昂絲效應啦!

Beyonce photos: publicist asks BuzzFeed to remove unflattering images

碧昂絲就是電力這麼猛,才讓超級盃電力在中場突然大停電。BuzzFeed記者勞倫雅芭蕾特在部落格上說,她在當天的表演,在網路上可說是數一數二的最「兇猛」的表演 碧昂絲這樣的控制狂受的了這樣的批評嗎? 碧昂絲的公關曾請BuzzFeed將這些不討喜的照片拿下來,Buzzfeed當然是讓他們吃了閉門羹。這照片像病毒一樣的在網路上擴散開來,碧昂絲最不希望其他人看到的,現在都被大家看光光了, 這就叫史翠珊效應,這個名過於實的歌手,曾試圖掩蓋她在馬里布,有房產的消息 嘿,碧昂絲:妳去吃一袋黃瓜吧

It’s okay to kill Americans – Obama Administration

It’s okay to kill Americans - Obama Administration

Did you just notice some weird object that was glowing in our animation? No, that wasn’t your eyes deceiving you, we’ve taken the liberty of “hiding” objects related to Chinese New Year in our animations as we ring in the New Snake Year. This week is your chance to become immortalized by NMAtv. You don’t even need to do something crazy or stupid! Find the object and submit your answers here: www.nma.tv/ISpyCNY or tweet your answers to @nmatv with #FoundIt – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Did you know it…

美國法務部備忘錄:教蠢蛋如何殺美國人的作戰守則

It’s okay to kill Americans - Obama Administration

一份16頁在討論美國政府可以在怎樣的情況下用致命行動攻擊美國公民的白皮書落在美國國家廣播公司新聞部 (NBC News) 的手上,備忘錄指出有權力殺死美國公民的條件如下: 在美國境外、是凱達組織成員或是有任何「交涉性關係」成員、對美國有立即性威脅的、並無法用任何其他實際方式逮捕的人。 這些模糊不清的說詞其實是當,美國要在國外無人飛機攻擊射死美國公民時讓歐巴馬來當擋箭牌的。 這備忘錄也指出在歐巴馬上任後,美國使用無人飛機攻擊有節節高升的趨勢,這不如小布希時代,那時大家都比較注重在獵殺某位凱達組織的成員。歐巴馬則轉變注意力,開始廝殺塔利班步兵,成果就是有4倍的無人飛機攻擊所造成的死亡率。 到目前為止,主要的焦點都放在用致命武器殺死美國公民的程序正當與否,但這真是在面對真槍實彈時能做到的嗎? 你同意歐巴馬政府所列出可使用致命武器的條件嗎?留言跟我們說吧!